Citizen activism and political developments in the transformation of the digital public sphere in Spain: From the “Pass it on!” SMS to Podemos

Autores/as

  • Víctor Sampedro Blanco Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid (URJC)
  • Eloísa Nos Aldás Universitat Jaume I de Castellón
  • Alessandra Farné Instituto de Desarrollo Social y Paz (IUDESP), Universidad de Alicante y UJI

Resumen

This paper discusses digital communication, activism and political system in Spain from a critical-historical perspective. The results of combined empirical and analytical research indicate that a critical digital public sphere emerged in 2004 affecting the evolution of the political sphere to this day. Traditional parties had a slow and instrumental approach to the digital realm. Conversely, cyber-activism unfolded new options of political action, both in the short and long term, transforming the bipartisan system.

Biografía del autor/a

Víctor Sampedro Blanco, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid (URJC)

Catedrático de Universidad

Grupo Ciberdemocracia

Eloísa Nos Aldás, Universitat Jaume I de Castellón

Catedrática de Universidad Dpto. Ciencias de la Comunicación Investigadora en el Instituto Interuniversitario de Desarrollo Social y Paz (IUDESP), sede UJI

Alessandra Farné, Instituto de Desarrollo Social y Paz (IUDESP), Universidad de Alicante y UJI

Investigadora

Citas

Acha Ugarte, B. (2018). The Far Right in Western Europe: “From the Margins to the Mainstream” And Back?. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 59, 75-97. https://doi.org/10.18543/ced-59-2018pp75-97

Alonso-Muñoz, L., Marcos-García, S., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2016). Political leaders in (inter)action. Twitter as a strategic communication tool in electoral campaigns. Trípodos, 39, 71-90. Retrieved from: http://www.tripodos.com/index.php/Facultat_Comunicacio_Blanquerna/article/view/381

Barassi, V. (2015). Activism on the Web. Everyday struggles against digital capitalism. New York: Routledge.

Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Boix, A. (2002). Libertad de expresión y pluralismo en la Red [Online freedom of expression and pluralism]. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 22(65), 133-180. Retrieved from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/267403.pdf

Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. British Journal of Sociology, 68, S181-S213. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12325

Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007

Candón Mena, J., Montero Sánchez, D., & Calle Collado, Á. (2018). Discourses and Practices of Radical Democracy. The 15M movement as a space of mobilization. Partecipazione & Conflitto, 11(2), 571-598. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p571

Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Coleman, S. (2013). The Internet and the Opening Up of Political Spaces. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess & A. Bruns (Eds.), A Companion to New Media Dynamics (pp. 375-384). Malden-MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Chadwick, A., Dennis, J., & Smith, A. (2016). Politics in the Age of Hybrid Media. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. Larsson & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 7-22). New York: Routledge.

Della Porta, D. (2011). Communication in movement: Social movements as agents of participatory democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 800-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.560954

Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: activism in the Internet age. Cambridge-MA: MIT Press.

Fenton, N. (2016). Digital, political, radical. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fuchs, C. (2017). Social Media. A critical introduction. Second edition. London: Sage.

Gillmor, D. (2010). Mediactive. Morrisville, NC: Lulu. Retrieved from: https://mediactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/mediactive_gillmor.pdf

Hübner, L. A. (2016). Opinion regulation or civic dialogue? Seeking new theoretical frameworks for the study of digital politics. Essachess. Journal for Communication Studies, 9(2/18), 43-51. Retrieved from http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/336/402

Iglesias-Onofrio, M., Rodrigo-Cano, D., & Benítez-Eyzaguirre, L. (2018). Marea Verde y Marea Blanca: nuevas formas de comunicación y acción colectiva. IC – Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación, 15, 193-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IC.2018.i01.07

Kavada, A. (2016). Social Movements and Political Agency in the Digital Age: A Communication Approach. Media and Communication, 4(4), 8-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.691

Kavada, A. (2018). Editorial: media and the ‘populist moment’. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 742-744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772144

Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two Bits. The Cultural significance of free software. Durham: Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://www.twobits.net/pub/Kelty-TwoBits.pdf

Kidd, D., & McIntosh, K. (2016). Social Media and Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 10(9), 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12399

Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies. The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871571

Lacatus, C. (2019). Populism and the 2016 American election: Evidence from official press releases and twitter. PS - Political Science and Politics, 52(2), 223-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800183X

López-Ferrández, F. J. (2018). Potencialidades, límites, contradicciones y retos del cuarto poder en red. De Diagonal a El Salto [Potentialities, limits, contradictions and challenges of the networked fourth estate. From Diagonal to El salto]. Commons. Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 7(1), 77-111. Retrieved from: https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/cayp/article/view/4248

Monterde, A., Calleja-López, A., Aguilera, M., Barandiaran, X. E., & Postill, J. (2015). Multitudinous identities: a qualitative and network analysis of the 15M collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 930-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043315

Page, B. (1996). Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Peña-López, I., Congosto, M., & Aragón, P. (2014). Spanish Indignados and the evolution of the 15M movement on Twitter: towards networked para-institutions. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15, 189-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931678

Poell, T. (2014) Social media and the transformation of activist communication: exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 716-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.812674

Robles, J. M., DeMarco, S., & Antino, M. (2013). Activating activists. Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 856-877. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.738238

Romanos, E. (2013). Evictions, petitions and escraches: Contentious housing in austerity Spain. Social Movement Studies, 13(2), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.830567

Romanos, E., & Sádaba, I. (2016). From the street to institutions through the app: digitally enabled political outcomes of the Spanish Indignados movement. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 74(4), e048. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.048

Sánchez-Duarte, J. M. (2016). The Net as a space for political militancy: technology and participation in the electoral campaign. Communication & Society,

(3), 33-47. Retrieved from: https://www.unav.es/fcom/communication-society/en/articulo.php?art_id=579

Sola, J., & Rendueles, C. (2017). Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2017.1304899

Toret, J. (2015). Una mirada tecnopolítica al primer año de Podemos. Seis hipótesis [A techno-political look at the first year of Podemos. Six hypotheses]. Teknokultura, 12(1), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_TK.2015.v12.n1.48889

Toret, J., & Calleja-López, A. (2014). D-CENT. Decentralised Citizens ENgagement Technologies. D2.1 Collective intelligence framework. Barcelona: D-CENT. Retrieved from: http://dcentproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/D2.1-Collective-intelligence-framework.pdf

Treré, E. (2018). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. London; New York: Routledge.

Waisbord, S. & Amado, A. (2017). Populist communication by digital means: presidential Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1330-1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521

Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2015). Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation. New Media & Society, 17(6), 880-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813518390

Descargas

Publicado

2019-12-27

Cómo citar

Sampedro Blanco, V., Nos Aldás, E., & Farné, A. (2019). Citizen activism and political developments in the transformation of the digital public sphere in Spain: From the “Pass it on!” SMS to Podemos. IC Revista Científica De Información Y Comunicación, (16). Recuperado a partir de https://icjournal-ojs.org/index.php/IC-Journal/article/view/467